I’m a Midwife by Profession
| The
interview conducted by Karolina Monkiewicz,
"Przegl¹d" no. 44 (150), 4-11-2002, released with unauthorized
title ‘Macho Are the Weak Men’. |
- Why do you run workshops for men?
Are contemporary men weaker and more helpless than their fathers?
- Honestly speaking, I don’t want to judge it. Our fathers lived in
totally different world, under the banner of war and then socialism,
and it was a completely different reality. Living then was unlike ours.
- And are classes attended by the hopeless?
- Workshops are attended by men who have the courage to confront the
stereotype of masculinity dominating our world and at times to expose
themselves to disrespectful assessments of those who are still stuck
in this stereotype. Anyhow, I also run co-educational classes and it
happens that, irrespective of sex, entering unfamiliar terrain demands
courage and flexibility, at times determination. In general, it is definitely
more difficult for men as the prevalent model of masculinity forbids
a lot. For example, feeling and expressing emotions, especially some,
are forbidden.
- Why should men need these workshops? What do they give them? How
can men profit from these workshops?
- First of all, not only men can benefit from them. The way one functions
in a given area of his/her life shows how he/she operates in other fields
and what its results are. If I go to the woods and there is lots of
rubbish, it tells me that I live in a world where people just throw
away things they consider worn out and redundant. This way the world
changes into a dump. A similar process takes place in the psychic area.
The workshops then are for men, but what happens during them, regards
not only men and not only they can benefit.
- What can one learn during the men’s workshops?
- First of all one can learn how to experiment and discover new, less
stiff ways of conduct and experiencing oneself and the world. For instance,
the workshops helped some men get away from an uncreative and brainwashing
work and find other ways of fulfilling oneself, also in this area. During
the workshops one can set free from behavioural patterns that were once
useful but now have fallen into disuse. The workshops also allow to
realize one’s heritage and acknowledge it. Only then can one knowingly
make use of it: either accept the heritage or change it.
- Media wring their hands over man, claiming they are weak and betrayed,
pointing that men don’t want to marry and that the end of the sterner
sex draws to an end …
- In the 19th century every subsequent German philosopher declared the
end of philosophy. It didn’t do any harm to philosophy. I daresay, it
is similar to the end of masculinity and other revelations of this kind.
- Referring to philosophers, Hegel thought that every nation has
its epoch when is given strength to carry out a mission. Perhaps we
could relate it to sex – first men were stronger and now women will
be?
- I would rather treat this philosophical example as a wit though the
world is changing indeed. Women behave differently than they did 15
years ago, and so do men. However, it is still far from women’s domination
in this patriarchal world we live in. Personally, I am more interested
in the very change rather than in general considerations. The process
work I use, states that a change is potentially good. The problem lies
somewhere else; i.e. in the fact that we lack the awareness of what
is actually happening and this brings pitiful results.
- Who is a real man?
- (laughter) I have no idea. Exactly the same as I don’t know who a
real woman, a real human being or a real Pole is.
- Haven’t you ever happened to think about someone: ‘What a man!’?
- I don’t perceive the world this way at all. I’m not looking for an
ideal or a model. When I come out with ‘what a wonderful woman’, it
is usually my reaction to various kinds of women. It is exactly the
same with men. I think in terms of ‘wonderful’ or ‘interesting’ rather
than ‘real’. Because otherwise it would mean that there is also a man
who is not genuine and so, that one pattern should be applied to all
people and then one should check who fits better. It is completely alien
to me
- Who are the men you work with for you? Clients? Patients?
- Surely not patients. People. At first unknown, then, more and more
close.
- What are the limits of psychologist’s responsibility? Obviously,
you may only show the azimuth to someone but all the same you are moving
a rock that may cause an avalanche, turn one’s life upside down.
- The way I see it is that if I don’t move that rock, I also bear responsibility.
The idea that doing nothing releases from responsibility is just an
illusion. Recently I was in Warmia (Polish lake district) in a place
next to a forest reserve where a rally route ran. Spectators – as “it
was not prohibited by the organizers” – parked their cars in the reserve
territory. The roar and stink of racing cars spread all over the area
inhabited by deer and boars and many species of wild birds. This wild
world was being violated. I felt strong and utter disagreement with
this situation. I went there outraged, alone, taking a stick with a
gesture of inefficacy. I saw a crowd, mainly men, and I thought to myself:
‘and now what? What can I do?’ Here they race, ‘strong’ men, admired
by the rest who dream about being like them. If I also dreamt about
‘strength’ I would be able to choose only between helplessness, i.e.
defeat and violence. I started talking to them. The reactions were mainly
defensive and disrespectful. One could say that my action gave no results.
On the other hand, I don’t have to watch helplessly and get poisoned
with unexpressed emotions when something I disagree with takes place.
I don’t have to use violence either. I can give voice to my feelings
and thoughts. In this respect responsibility is very important. Not
in the sense of burden with its paralyzing load, but as ‘responding’
to what I encounter.
- In China, a person who saved somebody’s life became responsible
for his/her future deeds. Therefore no one was too anxious to rescue
others.
- Fortunately, I’m not Chinese (laughter), and besides I don’t persuade
anyone to come to workshops and I don’t put pressure on anybody either.
If somebody feels like coming, it’s great.
- There is also another side of responsibility. The promoted model
‘take your life in your hands, you have only one life’ is for many people
an excellent way to wash their hands of their duties. In the name of
self-fulfillment, they leave their partners and sometimes their children.
- Almost everything can be used for an excuse or rationalization. But
you may also ask yourself a question: isn’t being in relationship and
bringing up children one of the ways of self-fulfillment? Surely, it
is. So the rationalization you mentioned is often a simple dodge.
- And how to bring up a child so that it will be able to take its
own path in life? For example, a son, speaking about men.
- I don’t have such a formula at my disposal. Obviously, various pieces
of ‘good advice’ come to my mind, but most important is to want to have
them – I mean a child – when you already have it. Children need to feel
and know that they are important and loved, and it is impossible to
pretend it. Apart from love, children need many other things, for example:
latitude and at the same time a sense of safety, and also the company
of their peers. I know it from experience, both as a child and parent.
We used to live in Toruñ with my wife and our children, in an apartment
for academics that was surrounded by a green belt. Our daughter and
son together with the herd of other children could play at will but
they knew, at the same time, that they could come to us any moment,
that mum or dad was always within their reach.
- What about being brought up only by a mother? It is often heard:
‘Oh, he’s been raised by his mummy.’
- There are many psychological stereotypes of this kind: if he is a
macho type, it means that his father didn’t take care of him, and his
mum had a sense of guilt and was overprotective. There are dozens of
such plain psychological formulas: when someone is like this, then it
means that his/her past was like that, especially mother. Life is much
more complex. On the other hand, it may be the case as a parent is the
first, most important model, a datum point for a child, which doesn’t
mean that it must stay this way, that one can’t change it. - Once sons
were raised in a way that they were taken care of by their mums until
they were seven years old, and then their fathers were in charge of
them.
Tribal cultures carry a number of important information. However, the
only fact that something is tribal doesn’t automatically mean that is
of high quality. In tribal traditions there are also patriarchal models,
a division into men and women done with an axe. Past or modern – none
of them – by itself – is a guarantee of quality.
- You stress that one shouldn’t stick to patterns, stereotypes.
Aren’t they useful to anyone? I have the impression that as capitalism
is for the resourceful, the world without stereotypes is for those who
are mentally strong as they won’t get lost in their lives.
- Stereotype is something that flattens and makes multidimensional things
one-dimensional. The entire richness of the world, everything that can
be tasted in life is turned into several schemes, to which one may stick
and use as a weapon against everything that is unfamiliar, and this
– as is well known – happens to be very dangerous. Stereotypes are created
in order to prevent oneself from thinking and encountering the unknown.
They leave no room for making discoveries. At the same time they evoke
fear that one won’t come up to the model: ‘I don’t look like, I don’t
have, I’m not…’ Besides, the very division into the weak and the strong
stems also from stereotype. One could ask here who is actually strong
and who is weak? If, as you’re saying, ‘the world without stereotypes
is for those who are strong’, then a weak person is the one who sticks
to stereotype, and so, for instance a macho, the so-called ‘strong man’
as he adheres to a given model of masculinity at all costs.
- Haven’t you ever had any ‘complaints’? Hasn’t anyone reproached
you for the changes in their life, i.e. that he/she used to live peacefully
and pleasurably and now they can’t reshape their life?
- Fortunately not and I hope that it will remain this way. I give notice
in advance that what I do is efficient and supports change not only
during the workshops but also in life generally. My role is that of
a midwife. I’m not a sage or an expert who tells which direction of
change is best. I only accompany people in their process of rebirth
and I do my best so that they go through it as painlessly as possible.
- I’m getting such impression… Don’t you run these workshops for
yourself by any chance?
- Of course, as it is my way of ‘tidying up the woods.’ My way of discovering
with others what is important to us, sharing experience and supporting
those who want it. If the binding stereotype of masculinity is that
a man can always manage and is hard and strong – and in fact is stiff
and inflexible – then this pattern does not suit me at all. In this
sense I do the workshops for myself – to make this world better for
me.
- Thank you for the conversation.

Interview
conducted by Renata Arend-Dziurlikowska for Zwierciad³o, April
2002. |
‘Do Strong Women Need Strong Men?’ This question implies an expectation
– let men change the way we, women, need it, you are to be like we
want you to be. It is difficult to build a relationship based on partnership
this way – says Zbigniew Mi³uñski, a philosopher and therapist, trainer
and consultant for organizational change in the conversation with
Renata Arendt-Dziurdzikowska.
- Women – as sociologists claim – are searching for their identity,
changing, almost on mass scale. It is no longer enough for us to see
our reflections and find confirmation of our self-esteem in men’s
eyes. We need strong men and relationships based on partnership. However,
we notice more and more often that our emancipating desires are perceived
by men as threatening. They ask boldly: ‘Since women are becoming
so independent, what are we for?’ We have a trouble then – how can
we discern men’s state of being at a loss? What can we do?
- Do strong women need strong men? This question implies the expectation
– let men change the way we, women, need it, you are to be like we
want you to be. It is difficult to build a relationship based on partnership
this way. If we want to have relationships that are not build according
to patriarchal model of domination and dependence that prevails in
our civilization, we can’t use the same methods. Otherwise it will
turn out that the only change is that now there is a strong woman
on top who imposes on a man what he is to do and what he is to be
like. What’s more, when I tell you: ‘you must be strong’ and you comply
with my demand becoming strong, then you are weak because you have
submitted to my demand. Therefore, the very use of ‘weak-strong’ scheme
makes it more difficult, and not easier to understand what is happening
to us. Undergoing a change is even more difficult.
- When I say a strong man, I don’t mean one, who dominates, but
one who accepts the fact that a woman can determine her life and be
internally independent. He himself is internally independent. Also,
speaking about strong women, I mean these who know what is good for
them and decide about themselves, and not about these who have power
over men.
- Still, in the prevalent understanding of the word strength equals
power. In English ‘power’ means both strength and control/influence/authority.
It means also status. And power is related to force. Are you trying
to say that women who decide about themselves need men who respect
their decisions?
- And they don’t feel offended or threatened. They are strong
because they love.
- To an average European strength means having a good job, post, car
and influence on others that results from his/her high social status.
Such men usually express their love by working hard. They focus their
activity almost exclusively on building their ‘power’ i.e. status,
in order to take care of themselves and their families and thus fulfill
physical needs and create a sense of safety. But as a result – as
Joseph Campbell, one of the most eminent myth experts, notes– they
finally discover that the ladder they climbed is leant against the
wrong wall. In many tribal cultures, like Toltecs for instance, a
man first of all was building his personal power. It is completely
different from modern understanding of power. Personal power is something
I’ve got regardless of owning a car or making a success. (Although,
obviously, success in the world and personal power are not mutually
exclusive). Personal power fills me and radiates on others regardless
of gadgets I possess. The most important thing here is who I am; what
a man I am.
-So it means that independent women need men with personal power.
-We all need such men and such women as the shape of the world we
want to live in depends on it.
A model: a man is someone who can always manage.
-Women work on their personal power while men do it rather reluctantly.
-There are some masculinity patters that impede personal development.
The basic stereotype says: A man is someone who can always manage.
A real man does not look for help because he should know himself.
If he started his personal development, it would mean that he can’t
manage and thus he is no man.
According to such a pattern a man should deal with ‘important stuff’,
which is building and protecting his power-status. Men have to fight
for survival and they have to win because the world is a ‘battlefield’.
They have to be better, because the weaker ‘disappear from the market’.
This is what the world is like. And such has been the traditional
division of tasks for at least 5000 years now. The realm of man is
‘world’, i.e. fighting and hunting and the realm of women is ‘home’,
that is ‘feelings care for others and for herself’. It is a very rigid,
one-sided division. Men and women do not realize many ‘aspects of
their beings, because for thousands years they have played only these
roles. Despite many changes the division is still very deeply rooted.
For example, a belief that ‘the world is a battlefield’ makes the
world be such. Men live on average 8 years shorter than women; they
suffer heart diseases, psychosomatic diseases, but still ignore their
deepest needs.
I had such a wonderful wife.
- Imagine a man comes to you and says: ‘I had such a wonderful
wife – submissive, helpless. I was an authority and oracle to her.
And now? She takes part in some women’s meetings, intends to go to
work, and asks me about nothing. I am no longer important. What am
I to do?’
- Obviously, the world is falling into parts for this man. He lived
in such a masculinity model – a man is a head of a family, the herd
leader, takes care of the weaker, i.e. of his woman and children,
he makes the rules and takes decisions. And now suddenly he collides
with something hard – in his opinion his masculinity has been challenged.
I would ask such a man what he desires, what he really cares for.
If he said he wanted the former situation back, I would advise him
to look for a new woman. It is obviously a provocation, but unfortunately
this is exactly what many men do. He does it this way because he can
as there are still women who accept the patriarchal model. So, if
that man doesn’t change while the woman keeps developing, their relationship
will probably collapse. I said probably, because the domain of relationships
is one of the most mysterious areas in our lives and making generalizations
about them is very risky.
So what I would do first of all, I would make the man who comes to
me realize what is going on and at what point his relationship and
his life is. The decision is his, not mine. The decision what he wants
to do with his life, as it is his life and his struggle.
- Let’s assume though, that he cares for the woman, who has changed
so much now, and that he wants to be with her.
- It is a wonderful, though usually not easy, situation for both.
The scheme they lived in, that seemed so obvious, ceased to work.
Until it worked, it worked. A day came after a day. There was no reason
to question it, though it was not ideal. They both knew what to do
and how to live. But now this sedative reality disappeared. It got
uncomfortable, uneasy. She has changed, and it is clear that there
is no coming back to the old schemes and roles. If – as you’re saying
– they want to be together, have the intention and will, then the
opportunity arises for them to create a relationship, in which each
can realize himself/herself. And as the woman is already doing it,
it is the time for the man. He has to take care of himself. An important
factor in the workshops I conduct for man is working with fairy tales.
Myths and fairy tales describe models, structures of the world and
pattern situations in which we live. They are collective dreams which
dream us, but they can also become mirrors, in which we can see ourselves
and make discoveries. What is important to me? Who am I? What do I
want? What brings me joy? What gives me a sense of fullness? They
give clues how to reach this fullness. They say, for instance, that
even when a hero fails – let’s say he has to set free an enchanted
princess, and he oversleeps the very moment of trial three times in
a row, because a bad witch gives him a cup of wine – then the very
act of responding to the call, he heard, changes the situation – the
princess returns to the human shape though she is still unapproachable
– and the story can go on, and the hero himself acquires new abilities–
the inexhaustible source of food, and nothing can mislead him now
or make him fall asleep. He will be able to notice at last the presence
of thieves, who steal from him something that allows to reach the
pick of glassy mountain without effort.
The life is happening for real.
- Many a woman would send their men to the men’s workshops…
- ‘Sending’ their men to the men’s workshops is not a good idea, just
as ‘sending’ their wives or girlfriends to the women’s workshops.
Moreover lots of men can take it not as an expression of love and
care, but as an extra task they are burdened with: ‘After al, the
scheme was plain. I’m supposed to play my role and I do it. I do what
I’m expected – I get along, I give a sense of safety, I earn, I have
the status in the society. What’s the matter? After all you were to
take care of all the rest and now there are some new tasks for me?
It is unfair, and besides, no one has ever told me that I am to be
in contact with myself and develop my inner self.’
- ‘So, I, the woman, I’m telling you this right now,’
- Unfortunately, it is not enough, and sometimes even too much. It
is not enough for a man to hear from the lips of his beloved woman
– I release you from fulfilling the prevalent masculinity model’.
Such a simple statement is not enough. Something more is needed here
so that he could release himself, and without it no change will take
place.
- I was convinced that a woman, who develops herself and finds
her personal power, is a man’s salvation. What kind of pleasure is
it to bear a helpless and dependent woman all life long on your back?
- It is true that women’s self-development is a great opportunity
for men as well. Potentially, it allows men to leave the inflexible
role forced upon him by culture. It doesn’t mean it will happen painlessly
though. We live in a world in which men have had a privileged position
for thousands of years. Sociology knows the following rule – the privileged
one doesn’t notice his privileged position, because he doesn’t have
to see it. His high position protects himself. Men from the start
were the winners because of sex. So, many of us have a deep-rooted
habit of not noticing things and also the unwillingness to get round
to take care of ourselves.
- What kind of men participate in the workshops?
- Those who want to meet other men, discover what it means to be a
man in the modern world, how to live a more satisfying, richer and
fuller life. It happens to be difficult in the beginning as there
is no such model for men to meet in our culture, unless they go out
for a beer or to watch a football match together. Contemporary men
do not know very often what they feel and what they want. They know
their basic needs – to eat, to buy a car, to make a success.
In our culture a young man is not trained to discover what he desires,
but to comply with a given model, and only this really matters. Many
young men can’t build permanent emotional relationships. Fathers didn't
show boys what a deep relationship with woman consists in. After all,
fathers didn't unveil many important secrets. They didn't help to
understand and feel that we are the part of a bigger whole. They didn't
reveal that the paradox of being fulfilled and satisfied as a man
is based, among other things, on the acceptance of one’s own incompleteness.
If I am a helm, a sailor and a ship for myself, and the hub of the
universe, then I will always feel unfulfilled. I will be doomed to
hunger appeasing which will have no end. Only when I discover there
is something bigger that exceeds me and to what I belong and whom
I can serve, then I discover my fullness. I don't have to dominate
anyone or depend on anyone. In short, the workshops for men are not,
I hope it is clear by now, a therapy, but may fulfill such a function
as well. They serve a purpose for us of not having in a few years
a sense of wasting our lives, and failing to fulfill and experience
anything. The workshops help us feel that the choices we make bring
consequences; that what is happening now is happening for real, and
that the time one day will stop running for us.
I need, I care, I would like
- Can we, women, do something to make our men see at last that
the masculinity model, they live in, limits them and often simply
kills?
- The most important thing women can do for their men is to develop
themselves. Certainly, don’t send them for therapy but clearly express
your needs and feelings. Begin with yourself: ‘if I want him to talk
to me, I start talking to him. A demand: ‘you must talk to me’ is
predetermined to failure. It is also throwing a burden of entering
a new area on the partner. Give time and space for a change to take
place. The worst thing one can do is to situate oneself on the other
side of the barricade: ‘I will be changing you now.’ Do not push,
do not press, do not force. But at the same time let yourself express
your own needs and expectations. If I want something that is important
to me, I clearly communicate it – ‘this is what I desire’. And it
differs from ‘you must do it’. Instead: ‘I need, I care’, sometimes
even ‘I'll not stand it any longer’. The partner will surely hear
it, unless he is someone to break with. The reaction may not be immediate,
i.e. what is happening between people is a process which takes time.
Sometimes we react sharply, but the important thing is where the reaction
flows from. One can always feel it. What level do we speak from? Is
it really love that leads us? Love towards oneself and love towards
him. The very nature of love is not greediness, it doesn't build prisons,
but just the opposite - it supports and gives strength.

The
interview for Gazeta Wyborcza
| Interview
conducted by Sebastian £upak.
Gazeta Wyborcza - Trójmiasto, November 29, 2002.
The interview was published with an unauthorized title ‘Crying
Is a Men’s Thing.’ |
-
You organize workshops for men. Do men, during the workshops, gather
together in a circle and cry like ‘old hags’ about how badly they
feel in this world? Do they pity their lives and misfortune?
- Well. Crying is not the worst
thing which can happen to a man. Sometimes it is the best. However,
in fact I know a lot of men who ‘pity their lives and misfortune’,
looking for the guilty everywhere but in himself, but these are
not the men who participate in the workshops.
- Why not?
- Because such men think in terms of the same categories your
question is based on. According to these categories an ‘old hag’
has the lowest rank and all ‘feminine’ behaviors are forbidden to
a ‘man’. This kind of thinking in its fullest and most consistent
form can be found in the criminal prison communities which are ruled
by violence. According to this masculinity model everything around
is ‘guilty’ but me. ‘I can't even let the very thought that it could
be different, cross my mind, because it threatens me with an instant
discredit and degradation to the lowest level in the hierarchy –
the level of an ‘old hag’’.
- What kind of men come to you then?
- The men attending the workshops have their point in coming
here. They have the courage to confront the stereotype of masculinity
which dominates our world and to expose themselves to misunderstanding
and disrespectful judgment of those who are still stuck in this
stereotype. It is not easy, especially taking into account that
the prevalent masculinity model forbids a lot.
- What does it forbid for instance?
- For example, it forbids men from thinking and behaving in
a manner that would stem from a more sophisticated matrix of notions
than the simple scheme that divides the world according to the strength-weakness,
success-failure, hero-coward, fellowman-stranger opposites.
- How do you help men find what they look for? How do the classes
look like?
- The classes mean an intensive self-development, that takes
inspiration from the wisdom of tribal cultures, myths, fairy tales
and process oriented psychology, developed by Arnold Mindell. Mindell
– living physicist and psychologist – began with working with dreams
and Jungian analysis. In the course of time he developed a new paradigm
of understanding the world and self, and he applies it successfully
in practice, both in his work with individuals as well as with groups
and communities. This way he supports a change and minimizes its
costs. So, what is happening at the workshops includes the work
with body and voice, with dreams, relationships and the world. It
consists in developing the ability to be oneself in a non-invasive
– i.e. respecting the borders of others – way, always and in every
circumstances. It also consists in discovering and contributing
to the world what is important to me and discovering that I’m a
part of a bigger history.
- Bigger history? What do you mean?
- It is exactly one of things to discover oneself and not to
read about it in a newspaper.
- You probably realize that the very fact of men’s gathering in
‘a circle’ without an intension of talking about f***ing and football
is suspected. Machos will say in the best case: they are some wimps.
What is the origin of this stereotype and are men really afraid
to register to the workshops?
- What is the origin of this stereotype? And what makes you
formulate your questions this and not the other way? Why do you
divide men into ‘machos’ and ‘wimps’ and into ‘old hags’ and ‘rednecks’?
Who exactly are you laughing at and what for? Are men afraid to
register to the workshops? It certainly happens, but rather to these
who are stuck in this masculinity stereotype you’re talking about,
because this stereotype forbids to discover new ways of behavior,
equating self-discovery and development with ‘weakness’. A ‘real’
man will sooner die than admit it.
- I don’t want to laugh at anybody. It just seems to me that such
a stereotype does exist and is very strong among men. You can surely
confirm it. Let me ask you again: what is the origin of this stereotype?
Does the upbringing determine it or maybe the tradition of a man-soldier,
the soccer fan or a master of bed conquests?
- The Neolith, when one primal horde conquered another…
- So we are fighting with primal instincts?
- Why ‘fighting’? What do you think, where this mental shortcut
that a change implies a fight comes from?
- All right: we are gradually changing primal instincts…
- And we change patriarchal patterns step by step in the direction
of what Arnold Mindell called deep democracy.
- Do we have to accept then that the time of patriarchate is over,
that a man will never be a head of family again and his wife will
no longer be waiting humbly with dinner at home? Maybe it is possible
to rule over women again?
- I hope it is not possible because the patriarchate is harmful,
and especially for men. It teaches insensitivity. As I said before
– though my experience teaches me that one time is definitely not
enough – the patriarchate forces to think in terms of strength and
weakness exclusively. It compels to a constant control and focusing
one’s attention on who is the bigwig and not on what is good for
one. The patriarchate makes one’s attitudes rigid and it forces
to perceiving the world as a battlefield and the land of conquer.
It makes it very difficult for us to go beyond our own, narrow-viewed
business. The patriarchate makes use almost exclusively of vertical
connections, e.g. a boss - his subordinate, a head of family-all
the rest, allowing no room for partnership.
- Do men do the right thing looking for the layers of ‘gentleness,
tenderness and love’ inside them in our hard times when a strong
elbows, necks, money and cunningness rule? Shouldn’t be men taught
insolence and pushiness during such workshops instead?
- There is an implication in your questions that power means
insolence and the so called pushiness while ‘gentleness, tenderness
and love’ are the signs of weakness. However, according to medical
statistics, the so called ‘tough guys’, whom allegedly nothing can
overcome, wear out fast. The question is who cares for what and
what price he is ready to pay and by whose effort one achieves it.
The very act of locating the problem within the strength-weakness
scale makes it impossible to go beyond this auto-destructive stereotype.
- So my question is: who cares for it and what price he pays?
- Those who are anxious to comply with the stereotype pay with
auto-destruction because the most important thing is the realization
of a given self image and not the self. In return it involves compulsion
to control oneself and the environment as it is seemingly easiest
to be in control when you are in a position of power. Moreover,
the image that determines what I should be like as a man, promotes
a rigid attitude imposing constant activity, domination and intransigence.
Instead, it eliminates friendship as it requires the forbidden feelings
such as intimacy and care, particularly towards oneself, because
all this is ‘womanly’. Usually a rationalization follows that something
external demands it from me: the family, the world, a situation.
The results may be seen at every turn: frustration, aggression,
depression and the devastated, littered world we live in.
- Doesn’t capitalism eliminate relationships based on partnership
because we have to compete one with another for work, money, success,
promotion?
- This is a precise example of a rationalization due to which
we can ignore the fact that – as one of my friends, Pawe³ Górski,
puts it – ‘we are the anvil of our fate’ [this is a variation on
the Polish proverb: ‘you are the smith of your fate’, i.e. you are
the master of your fate, you can shape your life]. In communism,
there was a different version of the assumption you have mentioned,
i.e. ‘one has to register to the communistic party because everyone
does it’ and one should steal because ‘everyone does it and, besides,
it is state’s property, i.e. no one’s.’
- How does feminism influence your attitude? Should men determine
their roles anew after getting familiar with feminists’ philosophy
and demands? Is the contemporary man feminist’s friend?
- I don’t think I know much about feminism. Most men I know
are even less familiar with it. Usually, while speaking about feminism
we use false and depreciating stereotypes. I wonder what makes us
do it. However, what I know about feminism makes me feel respect
and fondness towards feminism and feminists. The great contribution
of this movement, is, for example, making us, men, change our sexist
attitudes. It changed and is still changing us for the better, despite
the fact that it is so misunderstood and badly treated, especially
in Poland.
- Does a commercial presenting a sportsman, an athlete, or a businessman
do a harm to men? Should there be more pictures showing a man as
a painter, poet or one who does the dishes?
- In my opinion, the most harmful thing is the very division
into a sportsman, an athlete, or a businessman on the one hand,
and the painters and poets on the other, not mentioning the scheme
that a man in the kitchen means he does the washing up.
- Still there has to be someone to do the washing up and women complain
just about the fact that men do not help in the housework.
- Well, saying that ‘women complain just about the fact that
men do not help in the housework’ is men’s manner of avoiding the
real problem, i.e. the unloading the responsibility for a house,
home atmosphere and emotional climate in a family on women.
- Does a modern relationship have to be a battlefield? In their
sex war, women fight for their rights and men for their own and
everyone has something to prove. Is it still possible to cooperate?
Maybe the Swedish model, in which more than 50% of marriages get
divorced, is our future? Perhaps the future for both strong sexes
is living apart and having short-lived relationships.
- The sexes are neither strong nor weak. I will repeat it once
again: arranging the world according to the strength-weakness scale
does not clarify anything and doesn’t help to understand the changes
that occur. One may say, for instance, that the fact that man has
dominated the world for so long makes him be so weak and inflexible
now. Although the world is changing, he plays the long worn record
of strength and weakness with a suicidal stubbornness, destroying
himself, his relatives and the world we live in. I don’t know the
future. I can roughly see what is taking place now and it is the
present that I’m trying to deal with.
- Could you share your successes with me? Could you give specific
examples of men, who discovered something thanks to you, changed
themselves, and maybe healed their relations with the world and
women?
- No, I couldn’t, because men whom I work with as well as the
things we do are much more important to me than the so called success
or failure. If you would like to know if and what the workshops
gave to men, I’m not the person to be asked this question. The basic
rule I go by in my actions is respecting and not treating whoever
– myself or others – as an object, as an item for sale.
In the Men’s Circle
Text: Renata Arendt-Dziurdzikowska, Photographs: Miko³aj Czy¿
Zwierciad³o - January, 2004
|
I’ve met men who talk about inner happiness, love and their trust in life forces. I’ve met men who talk about sadness, despair and longing. ‘They are some sort of new men’, a friend of mine commented.
 It was five years ago that Zbigniew Mi³uñski – a 49-year old philosopher, therapist, team-building trainer, former academic teacher, fitter, carpenter, director of an experimental private high school, English language interpreter, director of an advertising agency – thought for the first time about conducting workshops on self-development for men. He used to hear from his female friends: ‘Why don’t you run workshops for men? Do something because we can hardly stand them any more’. He kept refusing. He knew that such an approach would lead to an inevitable defeat.
Now he’s laughing: ‘It seems that I did these workshops for myself’. He lacked men. They annoyed him but at the same time he missed them. He longed for being together with them without fear and hiding behind the guard, without fear of being criticised or ridiculed.
‘It was a longing for myself’ – he says today. – For knowing myself. In relations with others we encounter the aspects of ourselves that we have no access to’.
What hinders men from meeting their true selves as well as other men? ‘Patterns and roles are already prepared for us by the world.’ – says Zbyszek. ‘Let’s take for instance a warrior role model. For a warrior the world is hostile and threatening. It is divided into one’s familiars and strangers. Strangers must be defeated, subordinated or eliminated. It is the only guarantee for survival. The enemy may be lurking everywhere. Therefore I must control my surroundings and myself as my own weakness is the greatest enemy of mine. Only when I achieve domination can I relax a bit and look around with superiority. The presence of those whom I subordinated doesn’t allow me to feel my loneliness. It doesn’t matter. In order to survive I have to fight anyway. It is a lethal role model. It condemns men, women and children to loneliness, auto destruction and destroys friendship, relations with relatives and the world we live in. It kills the joy of life. This model takes many forms and also can adopt a disguise of spiritual development.

One Year More and Then I’ll Live Fully
Various men between 20 and 50 - businessmen, teachers, psychologists, artists, a financial director of a corporation, graphic artist, chemist and building entrepreneur – meet once a month at weekends. They sit in the circle where there is no privileged position. It is such an entirely new experience for men that it is difficult for them to talk about it. They tried though.
Jacek Cho³uj (a 46-year old furniture industry businessman) before he found his way to the circle two years ago, he had been dying: ‘I used to think that I was indestructible and immortal. I thought I could achieve anything. And then suddenly my world fell into pieces’. In the 90-ties he was one of the top three managers in Poland. There were trips to Majorca, building a house, karate for children, skies, sailing. Mission: to ensure family happiness. But there was no happiness. No joy. Sunday was the saddest day, one didn’t know what to fill it up with. Only one year more, I only do this or buy that and then I’ll rest and live fully and everything will be all right’. He got promoted and became a financial director of a corporation. But then his body refused to cooperate. He was lying paralysed and terrified. He felt he was dying, literally, physically. The hospital. He saw others die there. He realised he lost a lot in his life – the contact with real world, bonds with his wife and children. He tried to save himself – took up yoga, gym, went biking until he was completely out of breath, was on antidepressant drugs. All of these provided temporary relief but the pain inside remained. ‘What is going on with me? Why is it happening to me?’. He came to Mi³uñski’s sessions with these questions. Zbyszek offered him a place in the circle for men. Jacek: ‘I didn’t hesitate. Already after couple of minutes spent with Zbyszek, I knew he was my friend and he cared for me’
Longing for men’s world
Bartek Koz³owski (28 years old, works in a bank) came across the circle thanks to our magazine (having read the interview with Zbyszek Mi³uñski, April 2002): ‘I needed a contact with men in order to learn what it means to be a man in today’s world. I needed new patterns. I wasn’t a boy anymore and I didn’t feel like a man yet. I wanted to learn what men’s dreams and needs are.’ Bartek’s father died in tragic circumstances when he was 19. After his death many things remained unfinished, many didn’t take place. Bartek and his father didn’t have a chance to meet as equal. He lacked someone he could compare with.
At the end of his studies he went through a crisis: ‘What shall I do in life next?’ His acquaintances ambitiously looked for a job, dreamt about making career, were chasing money. He didn’t enjoy that. The question returned: ‘What do I live for?’ One day he realised that he lived in order to be happy. He began looking for fulfilment, alone. His friends were not interested in spirituality or psychology. It was particularly difficult to talk with men about feelings such as sadness or suffering but also about those joyful ones. Is showing feelings not masculine?
A decision to attend self-development workshops is like asking for help. Bartek: ‘There is a conviction that a real man has to cope with everything by himself. He has to be strong and always win. If he doesn’t get on well he is redundant. His value depends on what he can give, obtain and achieve. He can’t care for himself, for his own needs, body and health.’ Bartek sat in the circle with other men. It felt like they broke taboo.

And what if a politician began to cry...
Wojciech Ko³yszko (a 46-year old graphic artist and book illustrator) discovered a repeated pattern at the workshops, i.e. a boy abandoned by his father. ‘When I was growing up, I felt different. My father was not there. I was brought up by my mother. I retreated to my inner world. In my adult life I feel regret and the sense of abandonment returns. It is possible to communicate with women but not with men. A boy who was abandoned, will leave his children as a man.’ As he was brought up by his mother he is in a good contact with such parts of him like his inner child or woman, as he calls them. He didn’t feel a complete man. He was ashamed of his sensitivity as it appeared to be so immasculine and nearly worthless. He showed these sides of himself to other men and an unexpected thing happened: ‘I finally appreciated them. I am not ashamed of them anymore. On the contrary, they are my strength. Let’s imagine what would happen if a politician speaking about war suddenly began to cry instead of thumping the table and showing who is stronger.’ He wrote and illustrated a book for children about the importance of feelings and their expression.
Does a Change Mean a Revolution?
What are they really doing for the whole two days each month? They are often asked this question by their friends (observers are not allowed to participate in the workshops). They reply after reflection: ‘… we play drums, sing, tell stories from our lives being inspired by myths, we listen to one another’.
‘It is an intensive self-development work that takes inspiration from the wisdom of tribal cultures, myths, fairy tales and process oriented psychology, developed by Arnold Mindell.’ – explains Zbyszek Mi³uñski. – ‘It is body work, work with voice, dreams, relations and the world.’ It leads to internal transformation.
Mateusz Ostachowski (a 27-year old co-owner of a company selling IT solutions) says that his life has been changing since he entered the circle, although nothing changes on the outside: ‘I used to think that in order to develop spiritually you have to be a Buddhist lama or at least leave your home, family and go to India. It seemed to me that a change means revolution, destruction, severing all links, past in ruins. I was afraid to engage in self-development, I was afraid of what could happen.’ But he envied his wife who had her women’s circle. He discovered that a change could be safe and gentle and it could consist in appreciating what one has. He realised that nothing had to be destroyed if one didn’t feel like doing it. Every human being can explore oneself and experience the spiritual level of existence at the point in life she or he currently is. In the circle he met various men. He thought: ‘We are all so different from one another in regard of age, occupation, social status, education, place of residence and past’. But after a few meetings he felt how close those men are to him despite all the differences. ‘We all vary and still are so similar – he says moved by the discovery. The stories of our lives are theoretically different but in fact almost each one refers also to me. Our relations with fathers, women, work affairs, experiences and fears – all this is common’. He asked himself: ‘What did I set up my own firm for? Why am I doing this?’ The answer came: in order to have joy, get satisfaction, give himself to others. He doesn’t envy men their great successes anymore that are so often achieved by dishonest means or by killing oneself. He does business his own way. Calmly and efficiently. He has a partner whom he trusts (which is not so common), satisfied customers, pays taxes, employs people. He realised the value of what he had. He sighed with a relief.
The relationship with his wife is changing. They have been a couple since the first class at high school. They have always been together, symbiotically connected. ‘An argument meant the end of the world and was the denial of love to us’– says Mateusz. –‘We couldn’t part even for a moment because it would mean that we don’t love each other. All of these generated a high unexpressed tension between us.’ Now they both have their own matters, friendships, social circles and it doesn’t threaten their relationship but strengthens it. They have a feeling of being together anew. And they can have a normal argument at last as any good and healthy married couple.
I let down, I failed – how can I forgive it myself?
Being able talk about oneself, being listened to, being accepted is so little and at the same time it changes everything. Bartek: ‘I realised that I didn’t have to do anything special. I am a man anyway. Being a man means for me having a close relationship with a woman and with building a family. I don’t need much more to be happy. I no longer have to be the best in order to be good enough’. He found what he longed for – men who can listen attentively, express affinity and give support. He found men connected with one another by strong bonds and found acceptance.
They slowly release themselves from the prevailing model of masculinity. Jacek gave himself a chance for a new life. He changed his job, set up his own firm. He split with his wife. He is now rebuilding the relationship with his children. He doesn’t know if the firm survives in such a difficult market. Still, he doesn’t set himself too demanding goals. Maybe he will not succeed. He no longer thinks: ‘If I don’t manage, I’ll be a failure. It would be most difficult for me to forgive myself that I failed and let down my mother, wife and children. He goes to the next workshop being already so orderly and knowing everything about himself and then again a revolution takes place. He notices, for instance, how many critical thoughts towards himself and others he still holds. Yet, he feels happy deep inside, perhaps for the first time in his life.
Men say that it brings great relief when you are just yourself, genuine without manipulations, facades, charades, disguises and straining.
Twenty four hours alone with yourself
In summer the men went for their initiation camp. ‘We are all born unconsciously – Zbyszek Mi³uñski explains. – And so we don’t choose a country, a family or a body we will live in. At the initiation camp we have a chance to be born again, this time consciously. Then we choose our life consciously. In order to make this choice we need to recognise what is calling us – in order to find your place you need to surrender to what is leading you.’ The ceremony of initiation is preceded by a 24-hour isolation in the forest. The men say – and why not believe them – that you return from the isolation a changed man. This is what Bartek said about the experience which turned out to be one of the most important in his life: ‘I was alone with myself. I was thinking what I could do in my life, where is my place in life. Suddenly I felt inner happiness that is independent of achievements or earned money. I experienced the state of bliss, deep emotion and joy that is given to us at once, that is within our reach’. Since that moment he remains open to a question of how he could share this experience with others.
Zbigniew Mi³uñski:
On Crisis. A crisis signals that a change is taking place. It informs us that the old model has worn out and no longer works. Many contemporary men go through a crisis. Something doesn’t want them to live their lives the way they have so far. This something is wise. And I am here to support both the change as well as those who undergo it.
On Fairy Tales. According to the anthropologist Joseph Campbell, myths and fairy tales depict deep structures of the world we live in. They are the mirror in which we can take a look at ourselves: ‘In what stage of life am I?’, ‘Who am I?’, and ‘What is my point in life?’ A boy is usually the hero in myths and fairy tales about men. He becomes a servant, serves the king, grows mature, goes through ordeals and marries a princess. Using the symbolic language one could ask: what fairy tale or what dream becomes real in your life? Who is the King in this fairy tale? Whom do you actually serve? Are you the Knight of the Round Table, or an ordinary thief? What is the meaning of your life? There are many clues in the fairy tales that can help us live more fully. For example, there is a clue that a boy is the hero. It is the boy who has the ability to contact with what is rejected or hidden and this way he saves the mortally ill father.
On Personal Medicine. To an average European strength means having a good job, post, car and influence on others resulting from his high social status. According to wise and old cultures, at least the generic cultures of North and South America, it is a personal medicine that is important. It differs completely from modern understanding of power. Personal power does not depend on wealth or social status. Here it is more important who I am and what allies I have than material and social security.
On Spirituality. We learn to listen to our deep needs and then we begin to understand and feel that we are a part of a greater whole. The paradox of being a complete and fulfilled human being consists in accepting our own incompleteness. Only when I discover that there is something greater than me, something that exceeds me, something to which I belong and can serve, only then I can discover my wholeness. I don’t need to dominate anybody or become addicted to someone. I feel that the choices I make bear consequences, that everything what is happening now is happening for real and the time which is running will end for me one day.
|